Dubno 1941  
The Greatest Tank Battle of the Second World War
Author(s): Alexey Isaev
Published by Helion and Company
Publication Date:  Available in all formats
ISBN: 9781912866977
Pages: 0

EBOOK (EPUB)

ISBN: 9781912866977 Price: INR 1695.99
Add to cart Buy Now
In June 1941 - during the first week of the Nazi invasion in the Soviet Union - the quiet cornfields and towns of Western Ukraine were awakened by the clanking of steel and thunder of explosions; this was the greatest tank battle of the Second World War. About 3,000 tanks from the Red Army Kiev Special Military District clashed with about 800 German tanks of Heeresgruppe South. Why did the numerically superior Soviets fail? Hundreds of heavy KV-1 and KV-2 tanks, the five-turret giant T-35 and famous T-34 failed to stop the Germans. Based on recently available archival sources, A. Isaev describes the battle from a new point of view: that in fact it's not the tanks, but armored units, which win or lose battles. The Germans during the Blitzkrieg era had superior tactics and organizations for their tank forces. The German Panzer Division could defeat their opponents not by using tanks, but by using artillery, which included heavy artillery, and motorized infantry and engineers. The Red Army's armored units - the Mechanized Corps - had a lot of teething troubles, as all of them lacked accompanying infantry and artillery. In 1941 the Soviet Armoured Forces had to learn the difficult science - and mostly ‘art' - of combined warfare. Isaev traces the role of these factors in a huge battle around the small Ukrainian town of Dubno. Popular myths about impregnable KV and T-34 tanks are laid to rest. In reality, the Germans in 1941 had the necessary tools to combat them. The author also defines the real achievements on the Soviet side: the blitzkrieg in the Ukraine had been slowed down. For the Soviet Union, the military situation in June 1941 was much worse than it was for France and Britain during the Western Campaign in 1940. The Red Army wasn't ready to fight as a whole and the border district's armies lacked infantry units, as they were just arriving from the internal regions of the USSR. In this case, the Red Army tanks became the ‘Iron Shield' of the Soviet Union; they even operated as fire brigades. In many cases, the German infantry - not tanks - became the main enemy of Soviet armored units in the Dubno battle. Poorly organized, but fierce, tank-based counterattacks slowed down the German infantry - and while the Soviet tanks lost the battle, they won the war.
Rating
Description
In June 1941 - during the first week of the Nazi invasion in the Soviet Union - the quiet cornfields and towns of Western Ukraine were awakened by the clanking of steel and thunder of explosions; this was the greatest tank battle of the Second World War. About 3,000 tanks from the Red Army Kiev Special Military District clashed with about 800 German tanks of Heeresgruppe South. Why did the numerically superior Soviets fail? Hundreds of heavy KV-1 and KV-2 tanks, the five-turret giant T-35 and famous T-34 failed to stop the Germans. Based on recently available archival sources, A. Isaev describes the battle from a new point of view: that in fact it's not the tanks, but armored units, which win or lose battles. The Germans during the Blitzkrieg era had superior tactics and organizations for their tank forces. The German Panzer Division could defeat their opponents not by using tanks, but by using artillery, which included heavy artillery, and motorized infantry and engineers. The Red Army's armored units - the Mechanized Corps - had a lot of teething troubles, as all of them lacked accompanying infantry and artillery. In 1941 the Soviet Armoured Forces had to learn the difficult science - and mostly ‘art' - of combined warfare. Isaev traces the role of these factors in a huge battle around the small Ukrainian town of Dubno. Popular myths about impregnable KV and T-34 tanks are laid to rest. In reality, the Germans in 1941 had the necessary tools to combat them. The author also defines the real achievements on the Soviet side: the blitzkrieg in the Ukraine had been slowed down. For the Soviet Union, the military situation in June 1941 was much worse than it was for France and Britain during the Western Campaign in 1940. The Red Army wasn't ready to fight as a whole and the border district's armies lacked infantry units, as they were just arriving from the internal regions of the USSR. In this case, the Red Army tanks became the ‘Iron Shield' of the Soviet Union; they even operated as fire brigades. In many cases, the German infantry - not tanks - became the main enemy of Soviet armored units in the Dubno battle. Poorly organized, but fierce, tank-based counterattacks slowed down the German infantry - and while the Soviet tanks lost the battle, they won the war.
Table of contents
  • Cover
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • Contents
  • List of Photographs
  • List of Maps
  • List of Tables
  • Publisher’s Note
  • Introduction
  • 1 Army Group South
  • 2 The Kiev Special Military District
  • 3 The Longest Day
  • 4 The First Test – Radzekhov and Voynitsa
  • 5 Leshnev and Brody – “Striking with Fire and shining with a glint of Steel”
  • 6 The Anti-Tank Hedgehog – Dubno
  • 7 Conclusion
  • Appendices
    • I The Combat Order Written by the Air Forces of the South-Western Front No. OP/1 23 June 01.00
    • II A Report on the attacks on reinforcements on the mound at Sokal in the combat zone by the augmented [German] 199th Infantry Regiment on 22 June 1941 and the attacks on the reinforcements to the north-east of Sokal (the 75th Infantry Division) and to the east of Poturzitsy (the 179th Infantry Regiment) on 23 and 24 June 1941
    • III Strength of Aviation Regiments under the command of the Air Forces of the South-Western Front, 22 June 1941
    • IV Vehicle losses of the 10th Tank Division
    • V Strength and losses of combat vehicles in the 8th Mechanised Corps as of 20 July 1941
    • VI The Order of Battle of the Air Forces of the South-Western Front, 30 June 1941
    • VII Photographs of the Battlefields today
  • Bibliography
  • Plate section
User Reviews
Rating